One of the reasons that we started this blog was that Andy and I generally talk a lot of fantasy football throughout the season.  And preseason.  And pre-preseason.  Enough that, even though we don’t have full time jobs writing about it, we often think we would be better at doing so than many people that do.

Case in point:

Article (already discussed here) from Yahoo that amongst other things, has three “experts” pciking their ‘Top 5 players you’ll most heavily target in drafts.’  Now, I don’t know about you, but the top guys that I most heavily target in a draft are usually guys that will go in the first 2-3 rounds–maybe into the 4th, if I’m lucky.  Beyond that, it’s not so much that I targeted them, as they were the best of the rest.  Or the best of the worst.

In this article, Andy Behrens lists his #4 player as Matt Forte, rookie RB for the Bears.  Even links to an article, where apparently the value of Forte was previously discussed (I’d go into more detail, but it appears this article has already disappeared from Yahoo).

Now, fast forward to an article posted today, written by the same Andy Behrens.  In this article, which ranks the Bears as the worst team in the NFL from a fantasy stand point–a point I can probably agree with him on.  However, check out that first paragraph:

“Not surprisingly, there are no Bears among the top 25 quarterbacks in the Yahoo! experts composite rankings. There are also no Bears among the top 25 running backs, or the top 50 receivers, or the top 12 tight ends.”

So apparently, I’m supposed to be heavily targetting Matt Forte, despite the fact that he’s not a top 25 back.

The lesson here?  Both at ZoneBlitz and at Yahoo, you get what you pay for, in regards to fantasy football advice.