Favre Fiasco. Favre Fatigue. Favre F-k Up (of Off). Whatever you want to call it, Roger Goodell wants the Favre situation done. By Monday.
But why is it any of his business to make such a declaration? And why hasn’t he approved a players request for re-instatement for almost a full week?
We were all impressed when Goodell stepped in as commissioner, and started to try to crack down on possibly the only blemish that Paul Tagliabue left him with–the “degradation of the NFL society” we could call it, as several bad boy incidents started to paint the NFL in a bad light.
And I’ve been impressed by his willingness to come out against the ridiculous NFL Rookie pay scale that exists.
But I think by not acting on a players request to be reinstated within a reasonable time frame, and now declaring that he wants the situation resolved by Monday, he’s heading down a slippery path. If the delay wasn’t in the Packers favor (any delay to the situation hurts whoever ends up with Favre), I would suggest that they file tamporing charges against him. Of course, since he is the judge, jury and executioner, that wouldn’t get very far.
As to the Favre fiasco, rumors are that the $20-million, 10 year “marketing agreement” offer to Favre may be pushed to an even higher amount through negotiations this weekend.
Frankly, I still can’t believe that the NFL will allow this type of a deal to happen, without some sort of salary cap implications. I realize he’s a “retired” player, but as commenter Sir Whoopass pointed out last week, what’s to prevent Jerry Jones from starting to pay players from other teams to not play if the Packers are allowed to pay their own player not to?
Like the Poison Pill negotiating tactic (which to my knowledge wasn’t ever officially banned, but hasn’t been used since the Vikings nabbed Steve Hutchinson, and the Seahawks “retaliated” by signing Nate Burleson), this needs to be nipped in the bud early.
Too bad the NFL doesn’t have a commissioner who is willing to step in on situations like these…
Recent Comments