Jacksonville has extended the contract of quarterback David Garrard by signing him Monday to a seven-year, $60 million deal.
The agreement, according to media reports, includes $20 million in guaranteed money, including a $9 million upfront signing bonus.
Holy Hannah.
I like Garrard a lot. He’s got a ridiculous touchdown-to-interception ratio of 36 to 16 and last year alone tossed only three picks in 325 attempts. He’s relatively mobile.
And he seems like a good guy, which makes him easy to root for. He played the good soldier for years as a backup behind Byron Leftwich before receiving the opportunity to be the unquestioned starter last year.
But I think it’s hard to not have some reservations about this deal, which is short of, but in the same stratosphere as Tony Romo’s reported six-year, $67 million deal.
First, Garrard has never played more than 12 games in a season, primarily because he’s been a backup. But he also missed four last year because of injury. Second, do you reward a guy with a contract that big – the largest in Jaguars’ team history – for having one fantastic season?
Don’t get me wrong. I’ve already said I like Garrard and think he is a good player with the potentially to be borderline great. In this day and age of mediocre NFL starting quarterbacks I understand the Jaguars wouldn’t want to lose him.
But for a 30-year-old QB that has never thrown more than 325 passes or accumulated more than 2509 yards passing in a season, this contract was awfully aggressive.
At least the team has added Troy Williamson to his arsenal of weapons this season.
Holt has several years left on modern ballot, was in final 7 and after waiting until Fitz is elected in…
Zack Martin has given us our first class of 2030 first ballot candidate - agreed very possible Chiefs look to…
Jones didn’t play in 2024 which would make him eligible for class of 2029 as hall doesn’t use retirement “date”,…
Has Julio Jones officially retired from the NFL? According to nfl.com and profootballreference.com, he is still considered active? Would he…
I guess what I am saying Andy P is that transparency is great, just doubt that it improves the results