Jacksonville has extended the contract of quarterback David Garrard by signing him Monday to a seven-year, $60 million deal.
The agreement, according to media reports, includes $20 million in guaranteed money, including a $9 million upfront signing bonus.
Holy Hannah.
I like Garrard a lot. He’s got a ridiculous touchdown-to-interception ratio of 36 to 16 and last year alone tossed only three picks in 325 attempts. He’s relatively mobile.
And he seems like a good guy, which makes him easy to root for. He played the good soldier for years as a backup behind Byron Leftwich before receiving the opportunity to be the unquestioned starter last year.
But I think it’s hard to not have some reservations about this deal, which is short of, but in the same stratosphere as Tony Romo’s reported six-year, $67 million deal.
First, Garrard has never played more than 12 games in a season, primarily because he’s been a backup. But he also missed four last year because of injury. Second, do you reward a guy with a contract that big – the largest in Jaguars’ team history – for having one fantastic season?
Don’t get me wrong. I’ve already said I like Garrard and think he is a good player with the potentially to be borderline great. In this day and age of mediocre NFL starting quarterbacks I understand the Jaguars wouldn’t want to lose him.
But for a 30-year-old QB that has never thrown more than 325 passes or accumulated more than 2509 yards passing in a season, this contract was awfully aggressive.
At least the team has added Troy Williamson to his arsenal of weapons this season.
Robert ok see you then
Robert ok see you then
Brian i could 100% see that in terms of anderson being the next senior elected by the hall of fame…
Malcolm Butler for ruining my 16th birthday Russell Wilson for throwing out his loyalties and Arthur Blank for trading Matt…
Why would you be upset with Butler, Wilson and Blank, Andy?