data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f52fa/f52fa54628e666f759b2be0cd2686b7bf5b04731" alt="By The Numbers: The Best #79 in NFL History"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f52fa/f52fa54628e666f759b2be0cd2686b7bf5b04731" alt="By The Numbers: The Best #79 in NFL History"
By The Numbers: The Best #79 in NFL History
We’ve seen quite a few go down this path over the years—many just using a list of their opinions as way to drive pageviews–but our audience of Hall of Fame fanatics, combined with our non-traditional approach of bouncing around by picking numbers out of a hat leads to better content (in our opinion).
So, with the goal of getting us back to averaging more than one of our number posts per year, we finally get into the trenches with number 79.
Paul what do you think about this have more transparency
Here’s the article https://www.jacksonville.com/story/sports/columns/gene-frenette/2025/02/19/pro-football-hall-of-fame-changes-harder-entry-fred-taylor-tom-coughlin-gene-frenette/78972356007/
correction: Eugene Frenette is NOT a voter, but insights and quotes from his story were from several voters he contacted
in the coming weeks and months we will no doubt here more about discussions between voters and the Hall, including…
My change would be to go back to five moderns and two seniors, period. Eliminate the contributor category and have…